The Story of How We All Murdered A Sixteen Year Old Boy

Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki

Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki

On October 14th, 2011, we all murdered Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki. To understand why we are to blame, we must understand the nature of government and the circumstances surrounding his death. Ultimately, it is nationalism, taxation, and apathy that incriminate us.

 

The United States has both a socialized military and nationalistic attitude. We all pay for national defense through our taxes and thus, are purchasing the product that they deliver. Furthermore, we decide who leads this socialistic institution through the collective practice of voting. In November of 2008, the nation spoke and elected Barack Obama into office. Voting is the action that pushes collectivization through in this nation. Every four years we encounter the same cliché about coming together “as a nation” to decide on who our next leader will be. This political process is how we supposedly choose the person who will “represent” our nation in the larger world. Our participating in the political process is what led to the election of the man who authorized the drone strike that took young Al-Awlaki’s life. But this nationalistic collectivism alone does not make us responsible for the actions of the state.

 

The second institution that incriminates us in the death of the young Al-Awlaki is taxation. Our taxes are what fund our government run programs, including the military. Taxation, of course, refers to the income tax, inflation tax, and deficit spending. In other words, it is our money that funded the drone strike that led to Al-Awlaki’s death. However, taxation and collectivism combined are not enough to make us conspirators in his murder.

 

The third and final requirement to warrant guilt is apathy.  This is because to not act out, when our property does the killing, implies consent. To put it simply, did we show outrage after the fact? The answer is yes for a small segment of the population. Their hands are clean. The majority of Americans however, are all in on this crime. To understand why, we must look at who Al-Awlaki was and how he died.

 

Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki was born in Colorado on August 26th, 1995. He was a natural born U.S. Citizen and son of the infamous Anwar Al-Awlaki, a terrorist who was assassinated just two weeks before Abdulrahman’s death. The young Al-Awlaki had no terrorist connections and had not seen his father for several years, prior to his death. He was also killed, via drone strike, without a trial or jury. Al-Awlaki was not engaged in hostilities against the U.S. at the time of his death. The Washington post reported that the “Obama administration lawyers have said the military and CIA can target suspected terrorists outside of war zones only if they represent a direct threat to U.S. interests. But the criteria they use remain shrouded in mystery. There is no external review by the courts.” When asked about the extra judicial killing of a 16 year old boy who was born in Denver, press secretary Robert Gibbs stated “I would suggest that you should have a far more responsible father if they are truly concerned about the well being of their children.”[1]

 

How does all of this relate back to us? First, this administration was voted into office through the collective process of voting. Second, the bomb that ended this teenage American’s life was funded through our tax dollars. Our labor is what produced the wealth that was able to purchase the missile that killed Al-Awlaki. Finally, we return to the notion of apathy. What was the American public response to this atrocity? There were no major protests. A large portion of Americans still support this style of warfare. People still pay their taxes. The most damning evidence for American consent to this type of behavior took place about half a year ago. The American people came together and re-elected the same authoritarian regime that authorized this drone strike. They reelected the same regime that has not issued a public apology for the extra judicial killing of this American teenager. The majority of Americans either stood by and did nothing or supported the regime itself. Therefore, on October 14th, 2011, we all murdered Abdulrahman Al-Awlaki.

- Will Shanahan, Contributor, the Humane Condition.

 

NOTES:

[1] Connor Friedersdorf, “How Team Obama Justifies the Killing of a 16-Year-Old American.” The Atlantic, n.d. Web. 19 Apr. 2013. http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/10/how-team-obama-justifies-the-killing-of-a-16-year-old-american/264028/.

Craig Whitlock, “U.S. Airstrike That Killed American Teen in Yemen Raises Legal, Ethical Questions.” The Washington Post, 22 Oct. 2011. Web. 19 Apr. 2013. http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-airstrike-that-killed-american-teen-in-yemen-raises-legal-ethical-questions/2011/10/20/gIQAdvUY7L_story_1.html.


 

The Forgotten Tyrant: Franklin D. Roosevelt

Author Will Shanahan Committing Deicide

FDR on TIME

The Disillusioning of a Progressive God

            The world experienced a wave of totalitarianism in the early 20th century.  The Bolsheviks seized power in 1917, Mussolini was elected in 1922, and Hitler disbanded the Wiemar Republic in 1933.  Unfortunately, these extremist totalitarian regimes draw attention away from one of the darkest decades of United States history.  Benito Mussolini, Josef Stalin, and Adolf Hitler were so horrifyingly powerful that people often overlook an American tyrant’s rise to power, which began with the election of 1932.  Franklin Delano Roosevelt is mistakenly championed as an American hero who ran a benevolent regime that had the interest of the American People at its heart.  In reality, only neoconservatives and faux progressives could adore the most totalitarian president of the 20th century.  Roosevelt’s atrocities can and have filled entire books.  For the sake of brevity, this article will concern itself with two specific executive orders; one issued in peace time and one issued during war time.

The New Deal, often heralded as FDR’s Magnum Opus, is perhaps the second largest blight on his reputation.  Part of this plan launched the largest theft against the American people, short of the 1913 Federal Reserve legislation.  Executive Order 6102 ended the pure gold standard as well as mandating that U.S. citizens hand their gold over to the Federal Reserve.  FDR issued this order under the guise of stopping “gold hoarding” in an attempt to raise the total aggregate demand.  Economist Robert Murphy wrote that Roosevelt ordered the “public to turn over its gold—under penalty of a $10,000 fine and up to ten years in prison.”  Murphy continued, writing “the famous bullion depository at Fort Knox was built precisely to house all of the gold that FDR seized from the American people.” Fans of the New Deal must realize that nothing but a totalitarian regime would have the power and the audacity to seize gold from the citizens under threat of police violence.[1]

One might argue that this seizure of gold was perfectly acceptable and did not count as theft because the Americans were recompensed with $20.67 per ounce of gold traded in.  Regardless of the moral issue of the coercion involved, the American savers still took a hit.  The world price of gold per troy ounce was $20.69 in 1932.  By 1934, just one year after the executive order, the price had risen to $34.69 per ounce.  In other words, the price of gold had increased by 67.7%.  However, during the same time period, the purchasing power of the dollar remained virtually unchanged ($20.69 in 1932 had the same buying power as $20.24 in 1934).  People who purchased with gold (which was about every American citizen) took a huge hit after Executive Order 6102 was issued.  Americans were robbed of a valuable commodity by an executive order.  At least the income tax was passed with a congressional amendment (do not mistake this as an endorsement of the income tax).[2]

Before we jump from the 1933 peacetime Roosevelt to the 1942 wartime Roosevelt, let’s not forget that many horrible things happened in the interim period.  Crops were burned and cattle were slaughtered to keep prices artificially high.  Roosevelt attempted to stack the Supreme Court in order to get around overturned parts of the New Deal.  Massive deficits were run up.  However all of those are overshadowed by a single order issued on February 19, 1942.  The most shameful and insidious act of Roosevelt’s presidency was the issuing of Executive order 9066.  He declared that

“I hereby authorize and direct the Secretary of War, and the Military Commanders whom he may from time to time designate, whenever he or any designated Commander deems such action necessary or desirable, to prescribe military areas in such places and of such extent as he or the appropriate Military Commander may determine, from which any or all persons may be excluded, and with respect to which, the right of any person to enter, remain in, or leave shall be subject to whatever restrictions the Secretary of War or the appropriate Military Commander may impose in his discretion.”

President Roosevelt had just decreed that the executive branch had the right to authorize certain areas of the United States as military battlegrounds.  This gave the executive branch the power to indefinitely detain American citizens without trial (sounds eerily familiar).  Historian Roger Daniels wrote that

“although it mentioned neither California nor any ethnic group, Executive Order #9066 was the instrument whereby 120,000 Japanese Americans—including 90,000 Californians, two-thirds of them native sons and daughters—were removed from their homes, separated from much of their property, and incarcerated in ten desolate concentration camps, officially called relocation centers.”

Roosevelt indefinitely detained 100,000 Japanese Americans without a trial.  These people were not terrorist or Japanese conspirators.  Most of them were born in the United States as natural-born U.S. citizens.  These people were of no threat.  In fact, The Commission on Wartime Relocation and Internment of Civilians found that there was almost no evidence of Japanese-American disloyalty and that the internment was based on “race prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.”  This must never be overlooked.[3]

Over his 12 year rule, Franklin Delano Roosevelt found different ways to inject the executive branch into places it did not belong.  From the seizure of gold to the indefinite detention of American citizens without trial, he truly ruled with an iron fist.  Perhaps the worst American tragedy of the 1930s was that Franklin Delano Roosevelt did not follow in the tradition of President William Harrison.  I am sure there are many Japanese-Americans who agree with this sentiment.

(The author can be reached at wshanahan1@facebook.com)


[1] Robert Murphy, The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Great Depression and the New Deal (Regenery Publishing, Inc. 2009) 128.

[2] “Historical Gold Prices 1833-Present” National Mining Association, Accessed March, 2013. http://www.nma.org/pdf/gold/his_gold_prices.pdf

“CPI Inflation Calculator.” Databases, Tables & Calculators by Subject. http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=20.69&year1=1932&year2=1934.

[3] Our Documents – Transcript of Executive Order 9066: Resulting in the Relocation of Japanese (1942).” http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=74&page=transcript.

Roger Daniels, California History, Vol. 70, No. 4 (Winter, 1991/1992)

http://www.jstor.org/stable/25158587

Is your College Spying on you? Because, Mine is! Virginia Tech: Proud new owners of UAV Drone Launch Site Certificate

to match the permits to build the drones themselves.

 

Oh they are treading on somebody...

This is all according to official FAA releases and thankfully transferred into this easily navigated map using Google Earth to plot the points, and you can find the interactive version at the Electronic Frontier Foundation. There is also complete lists of all the certificates and permits awarded by the FAA in this recent release.

Jennifer Lynch at EFF paraphrased the truth behind what this really means. The answer is Nothing…yet

“Unfortunately, these lists leave many questions unanswered. For example, the COA list does not include any information on which model of    drone or how many drones each entity flies. In a meeting with the FAA today, the agency confirmed that there were about 300 active COAs and that the agency has issued about 700-750 authorizations since the program began in 2006. As there are only about 60 entities on the COA list, this means that many of the entities, if not all of them, have multiple COAs (for example, an FAA representative today said that University of Colorado may have had as many as 100 different COAs over the last six years). The list also does not explain why certain COA applications were “disapproved” and when other authorizations expired.”

That seems like a fair appraisal for now. We are basically left with enough information to know we’re getting f*@<=d, but not enough to hold a politician accountable.  I understand that standard is very high, but it is reality. If the congressman is not flooded with calls and outrage over a certain issue, he votes party lines without even reading the bill. That is only if he shows up that day.

The bigger question for me is, why isn’t the pubic outraged? We are the public, we are outraged!

And there you have it. We must be spending to much time arguing with people online when we should be robo-dialing our congressmen and senators. I don’t care what the bullsh*t media wants to report on this week, but I know what the public is pissed off about. I would assume 99.5% of the population today would prefer to save some money, rather than spend it on UAV’s to spy on ourselves. The .5% would be the few people that were lucky enough to find work, but it turned out to be this drone and after we put a vote to it, they are sh!t our of luck. (I really do feel bad for them). That is just the economic argument. Think about what this effects Constitutionally? Well we don’t know how bad it is yet, they are only beginning to tell us what they plan on telling us, and that can’t start at a very high percentage of info.

I don’t care to know the details about this. I know that we do not need 68 domestic drone launch sites. These are not coastal areas either, Blacksburg Va, where Virginia Tech will base it’s surveillance program for graduates in the next decade, is 5 hours from any coast. And it gets worse…..Kansas? Utah? What is it they need to know out there? NOTHING.

Call and e-mail your “local politicians” and ask “Why did you let this thing get built in our back yard?”.

They want outrage? Let’s burn up their phone-lines and go inbox bashing this week!!

Go to house.gov and enter your zip code and they give you all the info you need to contact all your representatives.